Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id PAA14019 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:27:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzxga19205; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:08:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA06726; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:09:14 -0500
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 15:09:14 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <n1391267708.58871@wb mail server>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: "Holman, Dimitri" <dholman@wb.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: RE: SGI
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Reportedly someone named Adam Christie spewed:
>> This has got to be a joke message! I've never seen a distributor do
>> anything like this on a product mailing list AND use bad grammar too!!
to the post from Dana of XAOS tools:
> What does you all think about Lightwave on the SGI???
Adam,
Go flame off in the bathroom by yourself. You need not flame newcomers to the
list in such an infantile manner and it is of no service to ANYONE on this
list. Are you sure you're a Senior in College? And I'm sure you've typed the
ubiquitous " teh " on a few messages... I mentioned the LW list to Dana in
order to provide a mechanism for XAOS learn a little bit more about the
needs/concerns of LightWave users. If more Software Developers where half as
interested in the needs of their users we'd all be much better off. The last
thing she needs is bullshit like the drivel you posted to a reasonable albeit
ambiguous question. If you don't have an opinion, why bother posting?
If anyone feels this post is out of order feel free to:
